.png%3Ftable%3Dblock%26id%3Dee0a8ca6-d8e2-48b8-89a4-952c1feeda41%26cache%3Dv2&w=3840&q=75)
Prompt Deep Research
Seeing the Unseen: The Story of Observability
Radar, Rockets, and the Birth of Observability
In the Cold War skies of the 1950s and ’60s, engineers faced a daunting puzzle: how to steer rockets and spy satellites when you couldn’t see what was happening inside them. Radar blips, noisy sensors and intermittent tracking data were all they had. In 1959, Hungarian-American engineer Rudolf Kálmán introduced a new idea: observability – the notion that one can infer a system’s hidden state from its external signalsacademy.broadcom.com. This mathematical breakthrough came just as vacuum-tube computers were being used to navigate long-range missiles and guide the Apollo spacecraft. NASA quickly put Kálmán’s ideas to the test. The result was the Kalman filter – an algorithm that turns a series of imperfect measurements into a best guess of realityplus.maths.org. By 1961, NASA engineers were using it to predict a spacecraft’s position using physics, then correcting that prediction with each new noisy readingplus.maths.org.
Kalman’s Crystal Ball: Predict and Correct
Imagine a pilot flying through fog with only a compass and the sound of creaking wings. The Kalman filter is like having a smart copilot: it predicts where the airplane should be (using laws of physics) and then adjusts that guess using instrument readingsplus.maths.org. It balances trust between theory and observation: if sensors look suspicious, rely more on the model; if the model’s outdated, weight the sensors moreplus.maths.org. This two-step dance – forecast then correct – gave engineers a kind of electronic crystal ball. In practice, the Apollo rockets and ballistic missiles “saw” through noise and uncertainty. As one popular analogy puts it, monitoring (simple checking) is like feeling for a pulse, while true observability is like running an MRI scan that reveals all hidden conditionsobserveinc.com.
Why We Need to Look Inside
Why go to all this trouble? Because control, prediction and trust depend on knowing the internal state. It’s like diagnosing a patient: you could poke and prod or break the open to look inside, but it’s much better to use every clue you have. Observability lets engineers treat their systems like doctors treating patients. For example, one guide compares it to using a car’s dashboard and even the color of its exhaust smoke to deduce engine troubles – without tearing the engine apartobserveinc.comobserveinc.com. If a house light won’t turn on, you wouldn’t wreck the walls; you’d check the breaker box and wiring you can seeobserveinc.com. Likewise, an observable system can be “fully understood simply by collecting surface-level data while the system is running”observeinc.com. This transparency builds trust: city planners, regulators, and customers can have confidence that the machine is working (and fix it when it’s not) before disaster strikes.
Cloud Control: Observability in Modern IT
In the 21st century, the battlefield has shifted from silos of circuitry to vast, cloud-native networks of servers and microservices. Every web app, smartphone game or streaming movie runs on a hidden architecture as complex as a city. When Twitter engineers moved from one monolithic system to hundreds of services, they built what they called an “observability stack” to monitor this new worldstrongdm.com. Observability today means collecting logs, metrics and traces to give DevOps and Site Reliability teams a health dashboard of the entire infrastructure. As one industry guide explains, observability tools let DevOps teams “understand not only whether each system is working but also why it’s not working”strongdm.com. These tools are the stethoscopes and MRIs of software: they sniff out anomalies in real time and highlight how components interact across hundreds of nodesstrongdm.comstrongdm.com.
In practice, observability has become a necessity for cloud-era reliability. Google and Netflix famously embraced it (along with chaos-testing), and surveys report that 90% of IT leaders now say observability is vital to enterprise systemsstrongdm.com. Why? Because in a containerized, microservices world, a tiny glitch can cascade across the network. Full-stack observability helps teams “find the proverbial needle in the haystack”strongdm.com – pinning down a faulty microservice before it spirals into a global outage.
Trust, Control, and Prediction
At its heart, observability is about not flying blind. When an outage or security breach hits, engineers need data to respond with confidence. As one SRE guide puts it: “How do we NOT fly blind when an outage or security incident occurs?” – observability provides that answerread.srepath.com. With rich telemetry, teams can predict system behavior (like an autopilot adjusting to turbulence) and build trust. In business terms, this means happier customers and CEOs: over half of companies report losing revenue due to unexpected downtimestrongdm.com. Observability’s deep insights help spot problems early (fast mean-time-to-detect and -resolve), keep SLAs honest, and even satisfy auditors. In short, it turns a mysterious black box into a transparent machine whose inner workings we can predict and rely on.
The Future: IoT, Cities, and Our Health
Today, observability is leaking out of data centers and into the real world. The Internet of Things means billions of devices – from smart thermostats to autonomous cars – will talk to the network. Cities themselves become instrumented: every traffic light, power grid sensor, and public transit vehicle becomes a data point. One expert argues that in a smart city, “you cannot afford downtime” when vital functions run on software networksgovinsider.asia. As SolarWinds puts it, in such interconnected systems even one network failure could “impact a larger swath of applications” and cause “massive disorder for the entire city”govinsider.asiagovinsider.asia. Observability – a full-stack view of all those sensors – will be essential to prevent gridlock, blackouts or worse.
This trend extends to our bodies and factories as well. Telemetry (Greek tele remote + metron measure) gives us a window into any system’s healthstrongdm.com. In medicine today, wearable devices and implants stream heart rate, temperature and more so doctors can monitor patients remotely – essentially making the human body observablestrongdm.com. Similarly, manufacturers use digital twins (virtual models of machinery) fed by live sensor data to predict failures before a machine breaks down. Observability will be the magic that ties it all together: a global nervous system of sensors and analytics. By listening to all these signals – traffic patterns in cities, vibration in machines, biometrics in people – we’ll gain unprecedented control and foresight. In the end, the Kalman filter’s legacy lives on: whether in rockets, cloud servers or smart cities, seeing the unseen remains the key to steering complex systems safely and smartlyplus.maths.orgstrongdm.com.
Sources: Classical control theory and Kalman filter originsacademy.broadcom.complus.maths.org; modern IT observability definitions and historysplunk.comstrongdm.comstrongdm.com; industry insights on DevOps/SRE observability practicesstrongdm.comstrongdm.com; analogies and future vision from observability expertsobserveinc.comobserveinc.comgovinsider.asiastrongdm.com.
Bayangkan ini tahun 1950 dimana militer Amerika mengembangkan misil jarak jauh dalam perang dingin. Misil bukanlah bom biasa — dibutuhkan presisi agar menjadikannya valuable. Kemenangan adalah bagi pihak yang dapat mengarahkan dan menembak misil dengan akurasi penuh!
Tetapi, ada satu masalah fundamental: Bagaimana kamu mengendalikan sesuatu yang sudah terbang ribuan kilometer per jalm… ketika kamu gak bisa melihat apa yang sedang dilakukannya?
.jpg%3Ftable%3Dblock%26id%3D1ee5878c-a3e9-80e6-a0aa-d07cae4b714e%26cache%3Dv2&w=3840&q=75)
🚀 Masalah Misil
Kita meluncurukan misil, dan berharap misil tersebut akan mengenai sasaran.
Tetapi berharap bukanlah strategi.
Kalo misilnya meleset gimana kita bisa tahu? Kalo pas misil di udara ada angin kencang dari timur dan misil berputar bisa gak kita ngedektsinya? Bisa gak kita merespons hal tersebut tepat waktu?
⚙️ State
Segala sistem dinamis — seperti misil — punya sebuah internal state. Pada satu momen, terdapat state posisi, kecepatan, orientasi, tingkat bahan bakar, dan variabel lainnya yang mendefinisikan semua tentang apa yang sistem tersebut lakukan dan apa yang akan dilakukan setelahnya.
Jika kita tahu statenya pada satu waktu, kita mungkin dapat:
- Memprediksi lintasan akhirnya
- Mengendalikan arahnya
- Mencegah kegagalan
Tetapi jika kita gak tahu state nya, kita buta.
Kita bisa ngirim perintah, tetapi kita gak tahu apakah hal tersebut efektif.
Kita bisa baca sinyal, namun kita gak tahu apa artinya.
Di masa ketika akurasi misil dapat mengubah kekuatan global, mengetahui state dari sebuah sistem menjadi sebuah perkara nasional.
🧩 Kepingan Puzzle yang Hilang
Tantangannya bukan bagaimana meluncurkan misil dengan lebih cepat atau membuat mesin yang lebih canggih.
Tantangannya adalah informasi.
Bisakah kita merekonstruksi tentang apa yang terjadi di dalam sebuah sistem hanya dari apa yang bisa kita pantau dari luar?
Teknisi mulai bertanya:
- Berapa banyak sensor yang kita perlukan?
- Apa saja jenis data yang dapat membantu kita mengetahui apa yang sistem sedang lakukan?
- Apakah mungkin merekonstruksi full picture dari sistem dari output yang gak lengkap?
🔍 The Birth of Observability — Formally